The internet is full of articles and reviews on virtually all kinds of products in the sun. While the reward of researching through stacks of articles may seem useful, sometimes the task of spending several hours comparing and contrasting different models and brands and trying to weigh all the pros and cons as you work through the process. it is. People spend hours researching products they know they need to buy, but with so many detailed reviews, why should it take so long to choose between all the options? The answer has to do with the dynamics of the common daily review, or what might be better called the "passive" review.
In most cases, once someone has written a product review, it remains static, that is, updates are rarely made to account for factors that may have changed over time, such as a firmware update for a electronic device or a design flaw that was not resolved until after the original review was released. And unless the reader can contact the reviewer directly, there may be specific key questions that the reader might have that were left unanswered. And so the reader inevitably moves on to the next review. The rest of the research process is more or less the same with the reader rereading certain articles again as needed. In addition to reading the data on product performance, features, and weaknesses, the reader is reading between the lines to assess reliability, any agenda that may appear biased, and the level of competition of the author's ability to reconstruct a robustly consistent review. . Then there is the business of conflicting opinions among reviewers? What causes one reviewer to rate a product very high while another finds nothing but flaws and oversights with that same item? These concerns contradict the shortcomings of the "passive" สินค้าไฮเทค นําเข้า review.
Almost everyone knows a person who is brilliant at jumping online, filtering out useful information from the useless verb, quickly assessing the reviewer's competence, and instinctively knowing what questions to ask next and where to get the answers. Perhaps you are this person and you enjoy the constant intrusive requests for help from friends and friends of friends, or you could imagine that your ability amounts to a kind of curse. It is undoubtedly true that the technique of efficiently scanning and flipping through review articles to find that perfect glove-fitting product is a true art. And this art is in high demand within a thriving everyday consumer market. Bottom line: There must be an easier method of locating products that consistently meets buyer's expectations. An effective approach to solving this problem is "active" product review.
The "active" review of the product differs from the "passive" approach in engaging the reader to become a participant during the review process. Instead of going blind with a brand-new Red Ryder carbine action, a two-hundred-shot Range model air rifle with an in-stock compass, and something that tells the time due to a hypothetically critical 3.5-star review, why not? You could just put your questions and concerns up front, just like going into a real store and having an individual discussion with a salesperson. Although in the end, the Red Ryder BB pistol might be suitable for its owner, it would have been more helpful to be able to discuss any pertinent questions or concerns about that type of product with a third party before pulling the trigger on the purchase.
Comments
Post a Comment